Analysis Session
Claude Sonnet 5 · 5 turns · 26.4k tokens
Read the audience as a board, so the argument leads and the evidence follows. Structure agreed before anything was written.
- 01Shape — conclusion first: summary and recommendations before the workings.
- 02Comparison — Q1 against Q2 on the same axes, no rebased indices.
- 03Evidence — four KPIs carried through every section so the story stays consistent.
- 04Honesty — the churn regression gets its own subsection rather than a footnote.
- 05Actions — every recommendation carries an owner and a date.
- 06Length — 14 pages; anything longer stops being read at board level.
Revenue is up 18.4% quarter on quarter, but churn moved the wrong way. Both are in the summary — jump anywhere from the outline.
Churn now sits under Key Findings with the cohort table beside it, and all five recommendations carry an owner and a target date.
Contents
Exhibits
Q2 Sales Performance Review
Revenue, pipeline health and the churn regression — with five recommendations the board is asked to approve.
Contents
What is in this report
- 01Executive Summary03
- 02Objectives & Scope04
- 03Key Findings05
- 04Analysis & Charts07
- 05Supporting Tables09
- 06SWOT Analysis10
- 07Recommendations11
- 08Action Plan12
- 09Appendix13
- 10References14
Section 01
Executive Summary
Q2 delivered £2.41m, up 18.4% on Q1 and 6% ahead of plan. Growth came from larger deals rather than more of them, which is the healthier of the two explanations — but net revenue retention slipped below 100% for the first time in five quarters.
What the board should take away
- Average deal size rose 27% while volume was flat — the enterprise motion is working.
- The cycle shortened by nine days after the pilot programme was standardised in May.
- Churn concentrated in the sub-£10k cohort, which we onboarded fastest and supported least.
- Q3 pipeline covers 2.8× the target, ahead of the 2.5× coverage we treat as safe.
Section 02
Objectives & Scope
This review answers three questions the board asked in April: whether the enterprise shift is producing revenue, whether it is costing us the smaller accounts, and whether Q3 can be committed with confidence.
In scope
- All closed-won and closed-lost opportunities between 1 April and 30 June 2026.
- Renewal and churn events across every active contract in the period.
- Pipeline created and pipeline coverage entering Q3.
Out of scope
- Marketing attribution, which is covered in a separate report.
- Cost of sale and commission modelling, pending the finance close.
Section 03
Key Findings
Growth came from deal size, not deal count
Ninety-one deals closed in Q2 against eighty-nine in Q1, yet revenue rose by £375k. Average contract value moved from £22.9k to £29.1k as the enterprise tier accounted for 46% of bookings.
The cycle shortened where the pilot was standardised
Teams running the standardised pilot closed in 38 days on average; those that did not took 52. The difference is large enough that it is unlikely to be noise, though the sample is a single quarter.
Churn is concentrated, not general
Net retention fell to 97%. Eleven of the fourteen churn events sat in the sub-£10k cohort, all of which onboarded in under seven days and received no assigned success contact. Retention above £25k was unchanged at 104%.
| Band | Accounts | Churned | Retention |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under £10k | 148 | 11 | 88% |
| £10k – £25k | 62 | 2 | 99% |
| Above £25k | 31 | 1 | 104% |
Section 04
Analysis & Charts
Section 05
Supporting Tables
Every figure below reconciles to the pipeline export dated 1 July 2026.
| Region | Q1 | Q2 | Deals | Win rate | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK & Ireland | 842 | 1,004 | 38 | 36% | 19.2% |
| DACH | 486 | 612 | 21 | 33% | 25.9% |
| Nordics | 401 | 438 | 18 | 31% | 9.2% |
| Benelux | 306 | 356 | 14 | 34% | 16.3% |
| Total | 2,035 | 2,410 | 91 | 34% | 18.4% |
Section 06
SWOT Analysis
- Enterprise motion proven at 46% of bookings
- Sales cycle nine days shorter than Q1
- Retention above £25k holding at 104%
- No assigned success contact below £10k
- Pilot standardisation adopted by only half the team
- Forecast accuracy still ±14%
- DACH growing 26% from a small base
- Pilot rollout to the remaining teams
- Upsell path from self serve into mid market
- Small-account churn spreading upward
- Enterprise concentration risk at 42%
- Two competitors now price below self serve
Section 07
Recommendations
Five actions, ordered by the size of the problem they address rather than the ease of doing them.
- 1Assign a success contact below £10kHigh
Eleven of fourteen churn events had no named owner. A pooled contact would cost roughly one headcount.
- 2Roll the standardised pilot to every teamHigh
Teams using it close fourteen days faster. Adoption is the only variable we control this quarter.
- 3Cap enterprise concentration at 45%Medium
Above that, a single non-renewal moves the quarter. Set it as a planning constraint, not a target.
- 4Fund DACH ahead of the planMedium
Fastest growth from the smallest base; two additional reps would be repaid within three quarters.
- 5Tighten forecast disciplineLow
±14% accuracy is too wide to commit against. Weekly stage hygiene should close half the gap.
Section 08
Action Plan
Each action has one owner. Where an owner is shared, the first name listed is accountable.
- Pooled success contact live15 Aug 2026Ana Duarte · Customer
- Pilot playbook rolled to all teams29 Aug 2026Marcus Bell · Sales
- Concentration cap agreed at board05 Sep 2026Maria May · Revenue
- DACH hiring approved and open19 Sep 2026Maria May · Revenue
- Weekly stage hygiene in place30 Sep 2026Marcus Bell · Sales
Section 09
Appendix
Method
Figures are drawn from the pipeline export of 1 July 2026 and reconciled against the finance ledger to within £1,200, a variance explained by two invoices raised after the period close.
Definitions
- Net retention — revenue from accounts active at the start of the period, including expansion and churn.
- Sales cycle — median days from qualified opportunity to closed won.
- Coverage — open pipeline value divided by the quarter's target.
Limitations
The pilot comparison covers a single quarter and was not randomly assigned; teams opted in. The effect is large but should be treated as indicative until Q3 confirms it.
13Section 10
References
- [1]Dreams AI, Pipeline export, 1 July 2026. Internal system of record.
- [2]Dreams AI, Churn analysis workbook, 3 July 2026. Revenue operations.
- [3]Dreams AI, Finance ledger Q2 close, 8 July 2026. Unaudited management accounts.
- [4]Dreams AI, NPS verbatim responses, June 2026. 214 responses, 38% response rate.
- [5]Dreams AI, Market sizing study, February 2026. Commissioned research, DACH and Nordics.
- Brief parsed and audience set to board
- Structure matched against 11 comparable board packs
- 4,182 pipeline rows analysed and reconciled
- Four charts and three tables generated
- Churn subsection added with cohort detail
- Awaiting sign-off from Revenue before circulation
- Circulate to the board pack for 5 September